Jump to Navigation

California Law Today

Class action lawsuit claims Subaru failed to disclose oil issues

Many residents of California drive Subaru vehicles, especially those individual who enjoy venturing into more rural areas. While the traction of the Subaru all-wheel-drive is a common reason for ownership, a group of owners in another state have filed a class action lawsuit claiming that Subaru failed to notify consumers of a defect that causes excessive oil burning.

According to reports, Subaru of America did issue technical bulletins to service professionals at dealers. The bulletins recommended that service departments replace piston rings in Subaru cars that presented with excessive oil consumption. According to the lawsuit against the car maker, however, the service advisory did not completely address the problem.

Class action lawsuit filed in California

The National Football League has been dealing with multiple lawsuits lately that involve everything from concussions to the alleged illegal supplying of drugs to players.

Eight players who previously competed in the NFL have filed a class action lawsuit claiming that the league illegally supplied them with painkillers as a means of keeping them in the game. However, they were not made aware of the side effects of the medication or the severity of the injuries that were being covered up.

Consumers file class action against California insurance plan

In the current economic and political environment, many people are left with questions about their health care coverage. When individuals find a plan that meets their needs — both for health coverage and budget purposes — they are usually very happy. Reading the fine print and asking questions is essential to understanding health insurance benefits. A class action lawsuit filed against a California insurance provider claims the insurance company didn't do enough to inform policy-holders about benefits.

The lawsuit was filed against Anthem Blue Cross of California. The suit claims that the insurance company defrauded millions of enrollees because it mislead policy-holders about coverage under plans. Specifically, the suit claims that policy holders were not correctly informed about what hospitals and doctors would be covered under the plans.

Could car fires spark personal injury claims?

Residents of California are more than familiar with the dangers of fire, but one area many might not consider the impact of flames is in a vehicle. Certainly, some vehicles do catch fire following a collision, but the U.S. Fire Administration says only a small portion of vehicle fires each years are caused by accidents. Most vehicle fires, says the agency, are related to engine, tire or wiring malfunctions.

One car that's been in the news lately related to fires is the Tesla Model S. Several car fires have been reported in Model S vehicles, some of them occurring after <a href="http://www.girardikeese.com/Personal-Injury-Wrongful-Death/">accidents</a>. After two Model S cars caught fire following collisions with road debris, the manufacturer installed shielding to the vehicle underbodies to help prevent problems.

2 killed, 3 injured in Cajon Pass auto accident

When an auto accident occurs, no matter the location or the number of vehicles involved, the chance of injury or death is very real. While this does not always happen, there are times when multiple people are injured or killed. According to authorities, an auto accident in Cajon Pass killed two teens and injured three others. Reports state that a dump truck collided into the vehicle in which the five teens were in.

Investigators on the scene believe that the dump truck was traveling on the southbound off-ramp of I-15 when it collided with the vehicle moving west on Highway 138.

California highway shut down for 2 hours after fatal accident

No one wants to receive a call about a loved one who has been involved in an accident. Even so, tragedies occur on the road every day, and families are faced with a number of decisions when someone is lost to an accident. One of those decisions is whether or not to file a personal injury claim.

A lawsuit isn't the right choice for every family, but in many cases, a claim for compensation can help families move forward with life as they are able. In some cases, those lost in vehicle accidents leave behind dependents such as spouses and young children; compensations claims can cover immediate medical or funeral expenses, but they can also seek coverage future expenses or compensation for loss, pain and suffering.

California Surpreme Court rules on class action waivers

The California Supreme court recently issued a ruling in a case that involved class action waivers. Initial reports of the decision said that the benefit was on the side of employers, but analysis of the 70-page court ruling may indicate that there are benefits and disadvantages for both sides.

The legal matter began when an employee of a limousine company signed a waiver that bound employment-based claims under arbitration agreements. The agreement included a waiver on class actions. The employee later filed a lawsuit against the limousine company, alleging failure provide appropriate breaks, pay overtime and reimburse expenses associated with business. The employee alleged that the company was in violation of state labor codes.

Woman sues hospital for medical malpractice

A woman brought a lawsuit against Simi Valley Hospital for medical malpractice, claiming that she has been living in a nightmare for many years due to a mistake made during a bladder-support and standard hysterectomy surgery.

The woman was 56-years-old in 2007 when she checked into the hospital for the procedures. Three days after they took place, she went back to the hospital because she was in a great deal of pain. It was then that she was first told nothing was wrong. Hospital personnel sent her home to deal with the pain.

Doctors on drugs could create surgical errors

California lawmakers have proposed legislation that would require doctors in the state to undergo random drug testing if they have privileges at any hospital. The law would also require drug testing of doctors after a major mistake was made during patient care. While workers in other industries are required to participate in drug tests, it's not legally required for physicians.

While some organizations may drug test physicians, there is no federal law on the matter. According to government studies, as many as 10 percent of working physicians have an alcohol or drug addiction problem. Some doctors are reportedly treating patients and performing surgeries under the influence of drugs.

Car accident lands 3 people in hospital for treatment

Throughout the state of California, it is common for car accidents to occur both on the highways as well as city roads. Just the same as any other part of the country, these accidents are the result of many scenarios, such as one driver who is not paying attention to the road and what is going on around him or her.

A recent accident in Lincoln County shows that some collisions can have serious consequences. According to Merrill Police officials, two vehicles were involved in an accident at the intersection of Pier and 3rd street. As a result, a truck landed on its roof, on the sidewalk.

Print this Page FindLaw Network
GK Results

The law firm of Girardi | Keese has successfully recovered in excess of $3 Billion on behalf of our clients.
The following cases are just a small sampling of the many successful cases G&K has achieved over the years:

$4.85 billion

Settlement with Merck, a major pharmaceutical company, for personal injuries to consumers of the drug Vioxx.

$633 million

Settlements with PG&E for toxic tort injury claims by residents of Hinkley, California (made famous by the film Erin Brockovich).

$1.9 billion

Settlement with Sempra Energy on behalf of California consumers who were defrauded by the manipulation of natural gas prices.

See More GK Results

Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.